would be knocked out of the fabric of his theory; and since he produced no statistics in proof of his assertion, his opponents were perfectly at liberty to challenge it. It must be admitted that Mr. Miller has not shirked the test. A considerable part of his work as editor of Dean Burgon’s papers has taken the form of a classification of patristic quotations, based upon the great indices which the Dean left behind him,1 according as they testify for or against the Traditional Text of the Gospels.